Falling down under

archigram_surfer.jpg
^ Surfer in collage snapped at the Archigram exhibition this weekend, at the Design Museum.

The exhibition and Archigram have been written about nicely by Dan, so I’ll just remark that it left me feeling elegiac, for a fallen future we used to picture; full of the psychedelic technologies of freedom.

The schemes, epigrams and illustrations looked like they were straight out of the pages of The Invisibles, or at least an imaginary Homes and Gardens feature on Mister Six.

It was interesting to visit with an art-director friend of mine, who was looking at it more through the lens of graphic design, and how the work has influenced recent graphic artists and commercial imagery.

Off down under for a couple of weeks, for some sun, surf and switch-off. I’ll leave you with this from The Guardian Review, a passage on Falling (and surfing) from Nicholas Lezard’s review of “Falling” by Garrett Soden:

“There are primatologists and anthropologists who suggest that it was a very strongly vested interest in not falling that led to our development of consciousness. Smaller animals, such as chimps, need not fear the consequences of a drop from the trees as much as we, or other great apes, such as orang-utans, who climb slowly and with deliberate caution. Besides, we have spent far more time, if you examine our family tree, up that tree than on the ground. With quite sophisticated balance skills, we are certainly very good at controlled falling: skiing, skateboarding, hang-gliding, mountaineering. Captain Cook was flabbergasted at the surfers of Hawaii: a lieutenant on the Discovery commented that the Hawaiians’ skill was “scarce to be credited”.

Surfing, for them, was a matter of deep religious significance, and when the Calvinist missionaries arrived, Soden writes, “a gravity sport was attacked as the devil’s work” – and not for the first time. Falling has always been metaphorically consistent in this regard: it is not approved of.”

Back in May.

The philosopher and the thermostat

dennett.jpg

Daniel Dennett profile in today’s Guardian

“He’s famous among philosophers as an extreme proponent of robot consciousness, who will argue that even thermostats have beliefs about the world. This argument turns out to be more about what constitutes our own beliefs than about the inner life of a thermostat. Part of this is because he uses the term “opinions” for the kind of conscious and considered ideas about the world that many people would mean by beliefs. He doesn’t think a thermostat is conscious. But he thinks its behaviour embodies assumptions about the world, and these can’t be distinguished, in their effects on the world, from beliefs: “Intentional systems have beliefs, or as-good-as beliefs. I use the word beliefs for the intentional states of all of them, including the notorious thermostat. But we have opinions as well as beliefs.”

Entire US captured in 20 days

Not an update of the current nasty geopolitical situation, but something from The Google CityBlock Project [found via ChrisDodo’s del.icio.us]

This aims to produce a visual search of the urban environment. In one of their presentations they have an estimate of how long it would take to acquire images of the US’s entire commercial streetscape:

  • “~2.4 million miles of paved road in the U.S.
  • We estimate that about ~1% are commercial
  • With a high speed camera (~250 fps), we can capture driving at about 10 mph
  • It would take approximately 100 days worth of driving time to capture the entire commercial U.S.
  • Spread among 20 vehicles and allowing 6 hours of capture time per day, it would require approximately 20 days of acquisition”

So, very impressive in capturing images of the city; but what about the Image Of The City that we actually perceive? Schyuler and Rich’s excellent tutorial at EtCon made this distinction plain.

However I guess – as ever with Google – worth keeping a close eye on.

Iteration’s what you need

From the N-Gage site today:

“The N-Gage QD game deck has all the gaming features of the original game deck, plus a few welcome adjustments – like hot swap for your game cards. We trimmed off the MP3 player (and some of the price!), gave it a slick, non-sidetalking design, and shrunk it all down so it fits better in your pocket… Hey, you talked, we listened!”

Seeing phone design iteration cycles in the console world, even the portable gaming world is exciting – also that the N-Gage folk got the joke, listened, acted and then co-opted the gag…

Stay on topic!

“Stay On Topic: This mailing list is by and for those who practice interaction design. All discussions on this email list must relate to interaction design. This can include discussions of sister disciplines such as information architecture, visual design, etc. but only as they relate to interaction design. For example, a conversation on color theory would be out of place, but one about the best highlight color for buttons would fine for discussion. For a draft definition of interaction design go to our web site at interactiondesigners.com.”

Oh boy.

My inner-masochist has driven me to subscribe.

I’ll see how I do…

I am loving Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

I am loving Newsmap – a flash visualisation of Google News I found via the equally dazzling angermann2

Rip, Mix, Churn

Andrew Zolli:

“Markets reward remixers with reputation, if not always financial reward, and act to validate new genres”

» Z+ Partners Weblog: Once more with Hobbits

Wake up

From Barbelith:

“...imagine what would happen to Pulp Fiction if, when the character of Jules looked into the briefcase, he “woke up” in mid-scene and not only realized that he was a character in a movie, but also realized that he “was” also Mace Windu and Shaft and a bunch of other characters in realities he can scarcely comprehend, while also glimpsing an uber-reality where all of those realities are just movies and he’s an actor called Samuel L. Jackson.”

Happy Eostre. I’m off back to Wales.

Cherry blossom girl

tokyo6.jpg

Windpower

tokyo5.jpg

Prototype No. 5

tokyo4.jpg

Wet mega

tokyo3.jpg

Once I was a little light

tokyo2.jpg

You are here

tokyo1.jpg

100 years of prototyping

Gene at Fredshouse.net – reflecting on Rem Koolhaas / IDEO’s Prada disappointments – does some expectation-setting around deploying tech beyond the desktop:

“I’m not surprised that Prada’s experience has been less than delightful. We did some large-scale demo systems and real-world user experiments in cooltown, and we discovered some serious challenges in deploying even relatively simple ubiquitous computing technologies.

...what seems straightforward to build and run in the lab, is an order of magnitude harder to make work in the world. Using wireless LAN? Count on interference. Using infrared? Count on sunlight and heat sources. Using RFID? Count on damaged tags and misreads. Using PDAs? Count on dead batteries, lost styli, frequent crashes, both the soft and hard (floor) kind. Oh, and everything will be obsolete or broken in a year or two, so count on plenty of ongoing support to keep things fresh and fun….

Ubicomp is hard, understanding people, context, and the world is hard, getting computers to handle everyday situations is hard, and expectations are set way too high. I used to say ubicomp was a ten-year problem; now I’m starting to think that it’s really a hundred-year problem.”

» Fredshouse.net: Prada epicenter revisited

Free as in speech

Fantastic news! Our correspondent writes that the BBC has decided to release the 2004 Reith Lectures in downloadable DRM-free mp3 – they should be available on the site tonight.

A great move, and hopefully the shape of things to come.

I wonder what the licence is, and whether derivative works from the lectures? The thought of DJ Dangermouse releasing ReithHop mash-ups might be an advance too far for Radio 4 stalwarts for now…

Ironically, the subect of this year’s lecture series given by playwright Wole Soyinka is “The Climate of Fear” – good to see Auntie (at least BBC Radio & Music Interactive… other recent news has not been as encouraging) bucking the trend.

The most important movie of the early 21st century

I have just watched the most important movie of the early 21st century

It’s name is Loony Tunes: Back in Action.

Everything is in there – it’s a knockabout satire of late captialism and it’s entertainments, and it’s a visual essay on the magical nature of our fictions and our technologies as we enter the rapture of the spectacle. Or something. So, so now!

And it’s got Duck Dodgers.

“Two thumbs up”- M. McLuhan

“I dug it, fully” – G. Deleuze

“Whoa! Basta! That f**cking ruled!” – U. Eco

Too early? Too often?

From Matthew Thomas’ post “Why Free Software usability tends to suck”:

“The practice of releasing early, releasing often frequently causes severe damage to the interface. When a feature is incomplete, buggy, or slow, people get used to the incompleteness, or introduce preferences to cope with the bugginess or slowness. Then when the feature is finished, people complain about the completeness or try to retain the preferences. Similarly, when something has an inefficient design, people get used to the inefficiency, and complain when it becomes efficient. As a result, more user preferences get added, making the interface worse.”

[Found via Phil]

Royksopping a look and feel

areva_royskopp.jpg

An advert for energy megacorp Areva rips off Royksopp’s video for “Remind Me” which excited us so a while back.

Except it can’t be a ripoff if it’s directed/created by the same team who did the original video. Right?

No mention in the behind-the-scenes supporting Areva website [where you can also watch the advert] if the ad execs phoned up and said “we want one of those Scandopop infographic epics for our energy corporation spot” – somewhat unsuprisingly.

yellowcake.jpg

Also nice to see yellowcake on TV again. A little French subversion slipped in there? Are these ad-agents provocateurs?

DNA on sufficiently-advanced technology

Great Douglas Adams quote found at Helmintholog:

“Of course, we don’t have real intelligence cracked – it’s a bit like Zeno’s paradox: we get closer and closer to the actual business of language, without ever reaching it. Like sawing someone in half: considered as a medical problem, it is very very difficult indeed. But if you just want to convince a large audience that you have sawn a lady in half in a cabinet – that’s easy.

I say that we really want to be fooled, and that is the secret of persuading people that we have found artificial intelligence. Even very stupid bots can appear intelligent if they are acting in accord with our preconceptions. “

Next Page »